From a few days ago, i made a rant about where Youtube changed the rules of earning money if we reached 10,000 views and some of our favorite Youtuber's videos are all deleted for a lack of fair use what we want to keep.
But now, im gonna talk about the one thing that makes you wanna ask "Why 10,000 views for money and why some of our favorite videos are almost deleted?". It was all because of one company called "Wall Street Journal". Its a company that they made a media article to tell us whats going on. But, we've seen something better for news...
But in nowadays, the WSJ is become a company to pointing out Youtube is an evil website with full of ISIS content and extreme politics, that resulting to losing all the advertisements, meaning that all of our favorite users will never be able to make more money from the lack of revenue. In other words, the contents with free speech, sponsors and others will never work at all, especially with Lootcrate, Audible and others won't help you to make money. Its as if that your fun rich personality is changing into a sympathetic poor person because of that.
One man in his channel called "H3H3Production" named Ethan Klein made a video that he explained that the WSJ post a lot of crappy articles with fake screenshots that they're trying to make attention that many videos are racists, sexism and offensive. It makes no sense at all since most of them are innocent. Talk about a "Genius" move, writers of WSJ. But it got worse that H3H3's video got a copyright claim from the music, which he had to remove it and upload his second video why he deleted it. Its as if someone is a supporter of WSJ to creating a copyright for the "media news power!!!11!". Its almost like someone made a false copyright law which is stupidly illegal!!
But im sure some of you already know the reason why Youtube is fallen, it was all because of two of our stars, Pewdiepie and Jontron.
For Pewdiepie, he made a video of anti-Semitic joke that wasn't as harming, even though Pewdie's personality is plain over-the-top (If you agree with me). But then the WSJ made a news to tell that Pewdiepie is a Swedish version of Donald Trump or Adolf Hitler. What the heck was that!? Why did they made an article soo desperate to make the biggest Youtuber into Nazi supporter!? He has done no harming at the Jews, he doesn't have a gun or bombs to kill them, he has no weapons in his home! But it gets even worse that one of the writer of WSJ was also make fun of the Jews before Pewdie's fallen, i mean what... The F*****?! This is one of the most hypocrisy thing i've ever heard, this person who wrote about Pewdie's fallen is a complete F***ing hypocrite and a retard!! Its as if that WSJ didn't fired him as if that its ok to make an article news to make our favorite star look bad, since he lost the partnerships like Disney's Maker Studio that he'll never make a second season of "Scare Pewdiepie". (even though we believe he's gonna put it on Netflix, what do ya say?)
And for Jontron, Oh my lord, this one is gonna be painful, even though i like Jon, but he went too risk. Anyway, from last month in March, he joined in Livestream with Destiny, he made a controversial opinion by saying that black people are commit crimes and worst race in America (Really, but what about white people, they're also commit crime and doing racism. Oh no, am i hypocrite!?). That ended up with a huge negative attention that Jontron has a lot of hate for his racism opinion, with losing subscribers and got fired from Playtonic Games while making Yooka-Laylee. Jontron posted his private video that he claimed that he admitted that it was terrible move that he made an political incorrect in his opinion. I understand what he did, but it was too late that he ended having a loss.
So because of our favorite Youtubers were fallen for a terrible movements, again, WSJ made an article that Youtube is a controversial website with full of bad contents, resulting hundreds of advertisements dropped from the website that every users struggles to gain more than 10,000 views to make more money to bring back the partnerships, and even almost every Youtubers with free speech were almost removed with no hope of advertisements and the fair use is nearly broken down that they'll probably get banned forever!
Wow WSJ, you've done pretty good to almost killing the biggest website of all time. you made the news that all users will never be able to earning money for the thousands of views and no way to make a free speech from a god awful censorships. Its almost like WSJ is a pollution to making a natural disaster that its the end of Youtube's world!
"But Anthony, they have money that they can pay to solve the problem right?", you ask yourself. Im afraid to say, no. Why? Its because since WSJ made an article soo desperate and overacting, Youtube lost 750 million dollars!! I mean Holy S***!! This is not a real joke, this this the real deal how we're never able to making money from revenue. Its as if WSJ is pocketing the website for racism truth. By that i mean No reason At ALL!!
Ok, so we can all agree that the WSJ is a cancer of media to make a shaming article news to making Youtube is an evil corporation. But in reality, its just for fun and entertaining video. Especially some content creators made their own news to talking about something whats going on not only around the worst, but in social media as well. Since Youtube dropped all the revenues, we are sooo desperate that make money and helping everyone to keeping safe and positive, but in reality, the media news went on and making a lot of shaming articles that we're like a crimes. But its not true, we just want to make something for peace and a good attention for learn our lesson and moving on, but the media didn't learning anything from before, they just went back and post an articles of S***s.
Il probably feel bad for every users of Youtube that we'll have no hope to keep going for revenues and keep videos safe from the copyright laws. Even though some people decided to making a signing petition that the WSJ get a loss for making a fake news and screenshots or even find some company to give a donation for saving Youtube, its not gonna be easy. Unless if you're like me that you saw GradeAUnderA's video called "How To Protest Online (Using The WSJ Pewdiepie Thing As A Case Study)", he has a good attention that the WSJ made a cheap A$$ news that its considered to be a "Fake news" for pissing off everyone to make money from a few years ago.
So for that, again, youtubers well earn less money for the lack of revenue. But unless you're lucky to creating accounts such as DeviantArts to exchanging you money into Paypal or even a Patreon that you'll easily earning money from your supporters/fans. They're not like Youtube to earning money for views/revenue, they're only earning money from the watchers or even some talented artists. they're easy that you'll earning moneys, somehow if you're poor like myself...
So enough of that, F*** the WSJ, lets make Youtube lives matter and great again and im about to making an upcoming movie review of "Ghost in the Shell 2017", which i can't wait to see how it goes.
If you have your opinions or your extra rant from the big drama, let me know in the comment bellow.
So, see you later and much love to you all.
Execpt WSJ
No comments:
Post a Comment