Saturday, 22 April 2017

Accusing anyone as "Stalkers"

You know, always like to hang out with our favorite people, whether you meet them in your town or even on social media.

However, most people really want to keep in private that they don't want to know who he/she is. Especially we want to keep our address, phone numbers and many more. We don't want to show it in the media, or otherwise we're gonna be in huge trouble for anyone who's going to trespassing, even annoying calls on phone or even get "Swatted". Thats exactly how "Stalker" works. Its the act that we're sneaking behind some people that we love that causes to become a criminal for exposing their identity on the internet. Which is outright illegal for the action.

Since im on DA, i like to hang out with some of my favorite artists or even some good friends for request, RP or even conversation on private note. Unfortunately, this website had some drama out there, like some arts got deleted for violation or out of nowhere, butthurt people who can't take criticism or even claiming that there's hackers out there, but many people like myself don't believe from the stupid hackers.

But then, there's some people who's despite of good artist, but not 100% perfect person for a bad attitude, that is a people who falsely accusing anyone as a Stalker at the supporters. Im not talking about some type of people who asking million time of request at artist for no knowledge of following the rules at all. I've seen some good artists that i like that they did a nice job of drawing, but then out of nowhere they decided to block the supporters to falsely accusing them as a Stalkers.

Thats exactly what happen with one user that i like is TUFFDrago. I like his work, but not his personality for his bad action. Which no matter you like his arts to giving fave, he decides to blocking you for no reason whats so ever that he falsely accusing you as a "Stalker". That movement is so bad thats not only illegal for accusation, but also cringe. This is like where Keemstar who falsely accusing anyone who's a pedophile, but that one is even worse. Anyway Drago, there is no reason to blocking anyone, despite they like your work like myself (even though you didn't blocking me in DA, but you literally blocked me in FA for no reason at all), it hurts your supporters, which they're desperately asking you to unblock them, i mean, some of your fans are harmless, they don't wanna stalking you to exposing your address. The only way to never trust, is some annoying fans who asking a cheap request, they're nothing but a time-wasters with no knowledge of suggestions. So please, you need to be fair and respect the supporters to enjoy your work whatever they want. either that or you put a rules to say "Comments before you fave", that'll works, just saying. So, please don't hate me for my rant, its just that i want to make a attention for your action.

But other times, some people who's taking way to seriously for taking a hate at the fans as not only "stalkers", but also calling them an "enemy" or even "Cancers", it hurts them that they'll either unsub/unwatch the users, reporting them for their problem or the worst of all, some fan who's gonna be traumatized for being hated and accused that he/she going to commit suicide from depression. That is a serious problem what im aware, like when i was young, i was desperate to give a respect to anyone, but i ended being blocked and getting butthurt that i was attempting to kill myself. Which is way to seriously to make a sympathy, you need to take a break for a week or a months, unless you make an apology they he/she will unblock you and accept the apology, or other time they'll never see you again.

I get the feel that the people who falsely accusing them as a "stalkers" is starting to get meaningless, its been nearly overused since the word "Drama". Like...
Over Fav arts: Stalkers
Average Fans: Stalkers
Harmless Fans: Stalkers
Fan Artists: Stalkers
Fan with Core membership: F***ing Stalkers!

I mean seriously, these fans are not criminals to finding you identity. Unless some fans must be a hacker if you send an Email address on private note that they'll access on Email account to screwing up with passwords denial and changing names, but thats a different story. Anyway, there's no reason to call them a stalkers for a criminal, it hurts them that they'll either never follow you or even commit suicide. You're not a vigilant to take a hate on them (except for some who's annoying.), or otherwise you'll be like Keemstar for not only false accusation, but also hating the fans. They just want to help you out for learning, give a sympathy to share the drama from the past or maybe draw a gift to cheer up politely.

So please, don't take it too seriously to calling the fans as a stalkers, cause if not, its getting meaningless. So enough is enough for a "Stalking Drama". So no more of that, i want to get back to my fun business of drawing and RP. So, if you have your opinion about the problem or any others you wanna talk, let me know in the comments.

So thanks for reading and have a nice day.

Sunday, 9 April 2017

WSJ is evil towards Youtube

From a few days ago, i made a rant about where Youtube changed the rules of earning money if we reached 10,000 views and some of our favorite Youtuber's videos are all deleted for a lack of fair use what we want to keep.

But now, im gonna talk about the one thing that makes you wanna ask "Why 10,000 views for money and why some of our favorite videos are almost deleted?". It was all because of one company called "Wall Street Journal". Its a company that they made a media article to tell us whats going on. But, we've seen something better for news...

But in nowadays, the WSJ is become a company to pointing out Youtube is an evil website with full of ISIS content and extreme politics, that resulting to losing all the advertisements, meaning that all of our favorite users will never be able to make more money from the lack of revenue. In other words, the contents with free speech, sponsors and others will never work at all, especially with Lootcrate, Audible and others won't help you to make money. Its as if that your fun rich personality is changing into a sympathetic poor person because of that.

One man in his channel called "H3H3Production" named Ethan Klein made a video that he explained that the WSJ post a lot of crappy articles with fake screenshots that they're trying to make attention that many videos are racists, sexism and offensive. It makes no sense at all since most of them are innocent. Talk about a "Genius" move, writers of WSJ.  But it got worse that H3H3's video got a copyright claim from the music, which he had to remove it and upload his second video why he deleted it. Its as if someone is a supporter of WSJ to creating a copyright for the "media news power!!!11!". Its almost like someone made a false copyright law which is stupidly illegal!!

But im sure some of you already know the reason why Youtube is fallen, it was all because of two of our stars, Pewdiepie and Jontron. 

For Pewdiepie, he made a video of anti-Semitic joke that wasn't as harming, even though Pewdie's personality is plain over-the-top (If you agree with me). But then the WSJ made a news to tell that Pewdiepie is a Swedish version of Donald Trump or Adolf Hitler. What the heck was that!? Why did they made an article soo desperate to make the biggest Youtuber into Nazi supporter!? He has done no harming at the Jews, he doesn't have a gun or bombs to kill them, he has no weapons in his home! But it gets even worse that one of the writer of WSJ was also make fun of the Jews before Pewdie's fallen, i mean what... The F*****?!  This is one of the most hypocrisy thing i've ever heard, this person who wrote about Pewdie's fallen is a complete F***ing hypocrite and a retard!! Its as if that WSJ didn't fired him as if that its ok to make an article news to make our favorite star look bad, since he lost the partnerships like Disney's Maker Studio that he'll never make a second season of "Scare Pewdiepie". (even though we believe he's gonna put it on Netflix, what do ya say?)

And for Jontron, Oh my lord, this one is gonna be painful, even though i like Jon, but he went too risk. Anyway, from last month in March, he joined in Livestream with Destiny, he made a controversial opinion by saying that black people are commit crimes and worst race in America (Really, but what about white people, they're also commit crime and doing racism.  Oh no, am i hypocrite!?). That ended up with a huge negative attention that Jontron has a lot of hate for his racism opinion, with losing subscribers and got fired from Playtonic Games while making Yooka-Laylee. Jontron posted his private video that he claimed that he admitted that it was terrible move that he made an political incorrect in his opinion. I understand what he did, but it was too late that he ended having a loss.

So because of our favorite Youtubers were fallen for a terrible movements, again, WSJ made an article that Youtube is a controversial website with full of bad contents, resulting hundreds of advertisements dropped from the website that every users struggles to gain more than 10,000 views to make more money to bring back the partnerships, and even almost every Youtubers with free speech were almost removed with no hope of advertisements and the fair use is nearly broken down that they'll probably get banned forever!

Wow WSJ, you've done pretty good to almost killing the biggest website of all time. you made the news that all users will never be able to earning money for the thousands of views and no way to make a free speech from a god awful censorships. Its almost like WSJ is a pollution to making a natural disaster that its the end of Youtube's world!

"But Anthony, they have money that they can pay to solve the problem right?", you ask yourself. Im afraid to say, no. Why? Its because since WSJ made an article soo desperate and overacting, Youtube lost 750 million dollars!! I mean Holy S***!! This is not a real joke, this this the real deal how we're never able to making money from revenue. Its as if WSJ is pocketing the website for racism truth. By that i mean No reason At ALL!!

Ok, so we can all agree that the WSJ is a cancer of media to make a shaming article news to making Youtube is an evil corporation. But in reality, its just for fun and entertaining video. Especially some content creators made their own news to talking about something whats going on not only around the worst, but in social media as well. Since Youtube dropped all the revenues, we are sooo desperate that make money and helping everyone to keeping safe and positive, but in reality, the media news went on and making a lot of shaming articles that we're like a crimes. But its not true, we just want to make something for peace and a good attention for learn our lesson and moving on, but the media didn't learning anything from before, they just went back and post an articles of S***s.

Il probably feel bad for every users of Youtube that we'll have no hope to keep going for revenues and keep videos safe from the copyright laws. Even though some people decided to making a signing petition that the WSJ get a loss for making a fake news and screenshots or even find some company to give a donation for saving Youtube, its not gonna be easy. Unless if you're like me that you saw GradeAUnderA's video called "How To Protest Online (Using The WSJ Pewdiepie Thing As A Case Study)", he has a good attention that the WSJ made a cheap A$$ news that its considered to be a "Fake news" for pissing off everyone to make money from a few years ago.

So for that, again, youtubers well earn less money for the lack of revenue. But unless you're lucky to creating accounts such as DeviantArts to exchanging you money into Paypal or even a Patreon that you'll easily earning money from your supporters/fans. They're not like Youtube to earning money for views/revenue, they're only earning money from the watchers or even some talented artists. they're easy that you'll earning moneys, somehow if you're poor like myself...

So enough of that, F*** the WSJ, lets make Youtube lives matter and great again and im about to making an upcoming movie review of "Ghost in the Shell 2017", which i can't wait to see how it goes.

If you have your opinions or your extra rant from the big drama, let me know in the comment bellow.

So, see you later and much love to you all.

Execpt WSJ

Thursday, 6 April 2017

Youtube's double FU

*sigh*

I expect that Youtube should find the way to fix everything after their infamous fallen from the infamous boycott accused by Wall Street Journal. But then, Youtube is going to be even worse than last year! If you're wondering how the hell is going on with the big company, we got two stories that they went too far to ruining users's career.

First up, Youtube announced that you'll never earning money before reaching 10,000 views. That right there is really pissing us off. They have no reason that you'll be very poor if you wanna reaching more than 10 thousand views. Why? Its all because they're trying to expanding partnerships for users. If you wanna expanding partners, why can't you just keep the previous rule that we can earning money for free instead of reaching more than 10 thousands. Il probably feel bad for every users they'll earning less and less money for the god awful upgrade partnerships. This concept is a completely cancerous and outright criminal.

Second and the final nail of coffin, is one of our favorite channel called "TeamFourStar". These guys are best known for a parody of Dragon Ball series known as "Dragon Ball Z Abridged". They've been doing this for seven years and they're funny and entertaining. However, they suffered a claims and strike of their channel. They're struggled to fight back with Fair Use. But sadly, they received a second strike of their video. Meaning that if they have a third strike, they're gone. Because of their damage from broken down copyright, they had no choice but to remove all of their movies and episodes of DBZA, but they're still there in their official website. This is the reason why we're jumping in the trend of #WTFU since last year. It really started to hurting our favorite reviewers that they like to doing reviews, but they ended up suffered a strike down from all those S****y DMCA for no reason at all. We are desperately to call Youtube to stop screwing almost every Youtubers for removing all videos and channels from strikes and stuff. We really need to keep our Fair Use to stop all those cancers to make Youtube better, but no, its as if the whole Fair Use is extinct anymore. I am sick and tired of all those BullS***!!

I mean, this how we have a happy start of Youtube 2017, right? No!! They're still going out there and kill all users for removing videos for "reasons" and even keeping their pockets from users before reaching 10,000 views. I feel like Youtube is being manipulated by Donald Trump or even Corporate Driver to making every users look poor and infamous. I get the feel that Google is gonna pull the plug of Youtube for losing their grace.

Seriously Google and Youtube, stop trying for S****ing at everyone with your cheap concept, we want free money from views and freedom with Fair Use.

#WTFU
#MakeYoutubeGreatAgain